Collect current evidence consistently before review.
Evidence first. Verification only after an explicit decision.
Zippri separates evidence preparation from authority. The platform can assemble the current evidence automatically, but a verification result and Trust Passport remain explicit governed decisions tied to the exact artifact subject.
Automate preparation, not authority
Evidence collection can be automated: repository identity, provenance, storage, benchmark and other subject data can be assembled consistently. The decision to approve a verification case is kept separate.
Bind the decision to the subject that was actually reviewed.
Expose approved trust scopes without hiding the underlying evidence relationship.
Signed verification receipts
A verification receipt binds a decision to the artifact/evidence subject that was reviewed. If a material artifact changes, currentness can fail instead of continuing to present the old receipt as proof for a new state.
Trust Passport for governed reuse
A Trust Passport can summarize approved scopes for a current subject and can be verified independently. Revocation remains part of the authority lifecycle.
Common questions about AI Verification
Can Zippri automatically approve an AI model?
No. It can automate safe evidence preparation, but verification approval remains an authority action.
What happens if the model changes after verification?
Material identity changes can make earlier verification evidence non-current, requiring a new review rather than silently inheriting trust.
Is a Trust Passport the same as a benchmark score?
No. A benchmark measures evaluation outcomes; a Trust Passport records governed verification scopes tied to evidence.